AKTUELT

UNDERSKREV: Kjetil Landrog, generalsekretær i Arkivforbundet, Ida Merethe Anderssen ved Arkiv i Nordland og styreleder i Arkivforbundet Ole Martin Rønning underskrev erklæringen.

ICA med ny erklæring om LHBTQI+-arkiver

Under kongressen i Barcelona lanserte International Council on Archives (ICA) organisasjonens første erklæring om LHBTQI+-arkiver og arkivarer. Tre norske delegater underskrev.

Publisert Sist oppdatert
ERKLÆRINGEN: Her er ICAs erklæring om skeive arkiver og arkivarer.

Erklæringen ble presentert som en overraskelse under programposten «Archives, Guardians of Identities». På slutten av sesjonen leste deltakerne høyt hver sin del av erklæringen som en symbolsk, og samtidig dypt personlig, handling. Erklæringen understreker at arkiver ikke bare er oppbevaring av fortiden, men også voktere av identitet og felles hukommelse.

Arkivforbundets generalsekretær Kjetil Landrog, styreleder i Arkivforbundet Ole Martin Rønning og Ida Merethe Anderssen ved Arkiv i Nordland var tre av deltakerne som underskrev erklæringen.

–Jeg synes det er bra at ICA som en global organisasjon fremmer denne saken. Internasjonalt ser vi at LHBTQI+-miljøene utsetter for stadig økende press, det er viktig at ICA setter fokus på det og gir sin støtte. Nå blir det spennende å se om erklæringen får en praktisk betydning, sier Ole Martin Rønning.

Rønning uttrykker en viss overraskelse over at erklæringen fikk såpass lite oppmerksomhet. – Da urfolkserklæringen ble lagt frem under konferansen i Australia i 2019 var det mye ståhei. Men nå var hele seremonien veldig diskré, om du ikke tilfeldigvis var på den sesjonen visste du ikke om det.

HØYTIDELIG: Erklæringen ble presentert under en programpost under kongressen i Barcelona.

Stigmatisering og usynliggjøring

Erklæringen anerkjenner den langvarige historien med undertrykkelse og stigmatisering som skeive har blitt utsatt for, og som reflekteres i arkivene på spesielt to måter:

a) Offentlige arkiver fremstiller skeive negativt, på en måte som kriminaliserer, ydmyker, stigmatiserer og sykeliggjør gruppen.

b) Skeive personer og gruppers identitet blir usynliggjort i offentlige arkiver

Videre heter det: 

Denne erklæringen anerkjenner uttrykkelig den viktige rollen LHBTQI+-arkiver spiller. Disse arkivene drives uavhengig av medlemmer i LHBTQI+-miljøet og fungerer utenfor de tradisjonelle institusjonsarkivene. De tradisjonelle arkivene har historisk sett – og helt fram til nyere tid – vært neglisjerende, fiendtlige og homofobe i behandlingen av dokumenter skapt av LHBTQI+-personer. Uten arbeidet til disse sosiale og fellesskapsbaserte LHBTQI+-arkivene ville store deler av historien og de personlige fortellingene til LHBTQI+-personer ha forblitt udokumentert.

Erklæringen har sju konkrete programposter.

Egen arbeidsgruppe for skeive arkiv

I 2024 fikk Ica sin egen arbeidsgruppe for skeiv tematikk: Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity Archives & Archivists Working Group (SAGDAA-WG). På norsk kan det oversettes med arbeidsgruppen for kjønns-, seksualitets og relasjonsmangfold. Gruppen skal arbeide med arkivbehovene og utfordringene til personer som ikke følger dominerende hetero- og kjønnsnormer. Gruppen ble opprettet etter et initiativ fra generalsekretæren i ICA, Carlos Serrano Vásquez.

 Selve erklæringen

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES DECLARATION ON LGBTQI+ AND SEX-AFFECTIVE AND GENDER DIVERSITY ARCHIVES AND ARCHIVISTS

We, the Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity Archives and Archivists Working Group (ICA-SAGDAA-WG) of the International Council on Archives (ICA), wish to submit the following statement, the purpose of which is to promote the recognition, protection, and dissemination of archives relating to Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity (SAGD) and to showcase and show due appreciation for the contributions of people from these communities to archiving across the world.

PURPOSE

The intention of this statement is to promote the recognition, preservation and dissemination of archives relating to Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity (SAGD) worldwide, and to recognize the contributions made by members of these communities in creating inclusive and representative archival memories.

This initiative is rooted in the principle of the diversity of archives in recording every area if human activity as established in the Universal Declaration on Archives (UDA) of the Ica.

What is Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity (SAGD)?

We use the term Sex-Affective and Gender Diversity to refer to those communities, individuals and organizations that identify with Sex-Affective and Gender Identities, expressions and practices that do not correspond to cis-heteronormative standards.

The description may be assimilated with the widely used acronym LGBTQI+, in which:

• L stands for lesbian women 

• G for gay men 

• B for bisexuals 

• T for transgender individuals (those who do not identify with the sex assigned at birth) 

• Q for queer people(those who challenge norms that reinforce inequality based on categories such as gender, sexual orientation, social class, or race) 

• I for intersex people 

• and + sign represents all other non-cis-heteronormative expressions or identities, such as asexual,non-binary, two-spirit, gender-fluid, and other identities.

PRINCIPLES

As stated in the Adelaide / Tandanya Declaration in 2019, the International Council on Archives (ICA) recognizes its responsibility to re-imagine the meaning of archives as an engaging model of social memory, a process that should culminate in a new model of public archives as an ethical space of encounter, respect, negotiation and collaboration.

Against this backdrop, this Declaration acknowledges the long history of oppression and stigmatization that LGBTQI+ people have suffered, as reflected in the archives through two types of practice:

The traditional representation of this group in documents preserved in public archives, which is biased, negative, criminalizing, stigmatizing, humiliating, and pathologizing.

The symbolic annotation of LGBTQI+ individuals through the cognitive and representational erasure of their identities in public records

This is why we assert that LGBTQI+ people have the right to be recognized as such in archival description and representation systems, through their identification and inclusion in ontologies and vocabularies used to describe documents related to LGBTQI+ community. LGBTQI+ individuals and organizations should participate as members of the archival profession and co-authors in the archival description of such documents.

Public archive acquisition programs bear responsibility for ensuring that historical records are kept of the general and systemic oppression suffered by the LGBTQI+ community as result of practices rooted in homophobia and discrimination, which have resulted in the creation of archives antagonistic to this community. Public archives must incorporate documentation related to LGBTQI+ individuals and organizations themselves.

This last point is particularly important given the lack of documentation on this topic. LGBTQI+ people represent between 10% and 20% of the global population, but this figure could be even higher. Estimating the size of this community worldwide is a difficult task, as in most countries, discrimination has led people to conceal their sexual orientation and gender identity. This explains the general absence of documentation produced by LGBTQI+ individuals, as such documents could be used against them by law enforcement officers, the courts, or medical professionals.

Therefore, the recovery, preservation and dissemination of archival materials produced by LGBTQI+ individuals and organizations by public archives is a fundamental step towards the normalization of this community within the archival sector, especially considering the high risk of loss and destruction of this type of documentation.

This protection also extends to ensuring that LGBTQI+ individuals and organizations can interact with public archives in normal fashion, whether as users, donors or staff members.

This Declaration explicitly recognizes that vital role played by LGBTQI+ archives, which are independently organized by members of the LGBTQI+ community and operate outside traditional institutional archives. These latter have, historically and until recently, been neglectful, hostile and homophobic in their treatment of documents produced by LGBTQI+ individuals. Without the work of these social and community-based LGBTQI+-archives much of the history and personal stories of LGBTQI+ people would remain undocumented.

ACTIONS

Consideration and inclusion of the specific characteristics of LGBTQI+ individuals and communities in archival descriptions.

Preservation and transmission of knowledge about the traditions and history of LGBTQI+ individuals and communities via oral history projects.

Research into the principles and methodologies used by LGBTQI+ communities for the creation, sharing, use and protection of their cultural expressions.

Development of guidelines and protocols that facilitate the systematic retrieval and archival processing of documents, collections, and data related to LGBTQI+ individuals and organizations worldwide.

Creation and maintenance of a digital platform for communication and resource sharing aimed at LGBTQI+ archives and individuals interested in or related to archives professionals, users and the general public.

Awareness within the archival community about the importance of the challenges, responsibilities and opportunities inherent in managing LGBTQI+ records and collections, as well as the high risk of loss and destruction of these materials due to these subject matter and the long history of marginalization and stigmatization faced by the LGBTQI+ community worldwide.

Promotion of communication and collaboration between LGBTQI+ community and its social archives, on the one hand and institutional archives on the other, through interdisciplinary dialogue with other groups working on issues of gender, women’s rights, social class, migrants, racialized people, people with disabilities, indigenous people, children, older adults, and any other group that has been historically marginalized by institutional archives and the archival profession.

Powered by Labrador CMS